Bundling of renewable energy with broadband starting to take off

Bundling of renewable energy with broadband and home monitoring starting to take off. https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/comcast-will-sell-electricity-in-pennsylvania …

The New York Times: Making the case for cheaper broadband in schools

The New York Times ‏@nytimesJan 30

Making the case for cheaper broadband in schools http://nyti.ms/1eaAwJt 

Care for Home Solar Panels with Your Honda? Next stage to fund Google Fiber?

Care for Home Solar Panels with Your Honda? Next stage to fund Google Fiber?

Googles next steps after Kansas City

[The hubbub and buzz around Google’s Kansas City fiver to the home (FTTH) project has died down as Google over the next year focuses on building out its network.

Google's secret strategy with the Kansas City Fiber project

[I have long been perplexed at how Google plans to make a profit with their Kansas City Fiber project.

A novel way to fund broadband FTTH Internet - converting old coax/copper into microgrids

[I have long argued that we need to find new business models to underwrite costs of next generation broadband – Fiber to the Home ( FTTH) if we ever hope to breakup the existing broadband oligopoly.

What the Green Bay Packers can teach us about broadband

If Green Bay, Wis., a town of 105,000 people, can raise $70 million to rehabilitate its football field by selling $250 stock shares, I bet $250 there’s a community in America that can raise $2 or $3 million for a broadband network. Any takers?

New York Times on how universities and R&E networks can help community broadband deployment

[Tom Friedman's OpEd piece in today's NYTimes http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/04/opinion/friedman-so-much-fun-so-irrelevant.html?_r=1&hp captures the essence of why Internet and broadband are so critical to the future of our economy.

Customer Owned Fiber Network in Durban South Africa

“@tim_poulus: Successful customer-owned network near Durban (SA): FTTH beating ADSL pricing, plans uncapped service. http://t.co/rIaSyCe”

Consortium of 30+ universities to build next generation community broadband

[Here is a great example of how universities and R&E networks can play a critical national leadership role in the deployment of national broadband and help break the current broadband duopoly which is constraining innovation and economic growth.

Quebec announces $900m for provincial broadband initiative

[Almost totally ignored in the English Canadian press was the recent announcement by the Quebec government to spend $900m to provide high speed next generation Internet to all of Quebec.

Broadband and Economic Development - a hard look at job creation from all angles

[A very timely and important issue – BSA]
http://www.bbpmag.com/2011s/11economic-dev.php

Dear Colleagues,
Of the many great challenges that the United States faces today, none is more important or urgent than spurring robust economic development in our communities across America.

The answer to Network Neutrality, data caps and Usage Based Billing lies with Google, Amazon, Netflix, Apple

[There has been a lot of noise in the blogosphere recently about usage based billing (UBB) and price caps coming to the US. Something I warned would happen based on the Canadian experience.

Must read: The economics of last mile fiber

[A great article by Herman Wagter on the economics of FTTH. Herman was the engineer who built the Amsterdam city FTTH network. Some excerpts – BSA]

Fiber-to-the-X: the economics of last-mile fiber

Google to deploy Fiber to the Home in Selected Communities

From Google Policy Blog
http://www.google.com/appserve/fiberrfi/

Given how important broadband capability is to economic growth and job creation, it's no surprise that it's become a major topic of discussion in Washington.

FTTH leads to energy reduction of 73%, CO2 emissions reduction of 85%.

Stark results from Etisalat in the UAE: FTTH leads to energy reduction of 73%, CO2 emissions reduction of 85%.

Must Read: Excellent OECD report on FTTh and Innovation

[Some excerpts -- BSA]

NETWORK DEVELOPMENTS IN SUPPORT OF INNOVATION AND USER NEEDS

The Economist on customer owned fiber

http://bit.ly/8Inecd

[Great article in this week's economist on customer owned paper based on the original paper by Derek Slater and Tim WU, which was based on the project we have in Ottawa and elsewhere -- BSA]

UTOPIA Trailblazing New Opportunity For Customer-Owned Fiber

[Some excerpts from Geoff Daily's excellent blog on Broadband. As you
know this has been a model I have been advocating for some time, and
have tried to deploy in Ottawa with additional twist of bundling the
cost with the customer's energy bill -- BSA]

Geoff Daily's Blog: http://www.app-rising.com/

My blog: http://free-fiber-to-the-home.blogspot.com/

UTOPIA Trailblazing New Opportunity For User-Owned Fiber

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.app-rising.com/2009/11/utopia_proving_new_option_for.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+AppRising+(App-Rising)&utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher

An exciting development has occurred recently in the world of fiber
deployment. A new model is emerging in Brigham City, a city of less
than 20,000 in northern Utah, for how user-owned open fiber networks
can be financed and deployed.

It used to be that the only way you could get fiber was if you were
lucky enough to have a private provider lay it or to live in a city
that did it itself. Today in Brigham City, for $3,000 you can buy your
own fiber. And in fact more than 1,600 local residents have already
bought in to this new opportunity.

With that fiber they'll get access to UTOPIA's competitive and
growing ecosystem of service providers, where they get to choose what
services from what providers they want running on their pipe.

While this may sound radically different from how fiber has been
traditionally deployed in the US to date, user-owned open fiber
networks have already been a big success in Sweden, helping them wire
remote mountainous communities with world-class broadband
infrastructure.

We also need to realize how potentially brilliant the open fiber
concept is for rural America because of how it allows for competition
to happen between service providers on a single pipe. With open fiber
you can make sure that everyone benefits from having access to a
competitive marketplace of communications services.

But I'm even more excited about what UTOPIA's new model could mean
for the future of fiber deployment.

The biggest problem with the economics of deploying fiber is that you
have to carry a massive debt load and begin paying it off before much
revenue starts coming in. Plus you have to invest a lot of money into
neighborhoods without any real idea of how many people are going to
sign up for service.

The user-owned model totally changes these dynamics. First off, by
having users pay for their own pipes you disaggregate most of the
debt. Just look at Brigham City. They're building a $5.5 million
network and the city's only putting up less than $700,000. So no
massive debt load for the city (or a private provider for that matter)
to carry.

The second major piece of this is that UTOPIA's going to have
built-in take-rates when they build out neighborhoods. Plus churn
should fall to zero since people own their pipes.

Basically the way I see this is as the possible beginnings of a new
third model for fiber deployment in the US. You no longer have to wait
for a private provider to make the investment, or for your city to
figure out how it can overcome all the roadblocks and then actually
execute effectively. Instead users who want service can band together
and find a way to get it now rather than waiting twenty years for
someone else to figure out how to do it.



They have developed a special assessment area model, though, that
allows homeowners to commit to a $25 a month payment over 15 years to
spread out the cost over time.

Another potential trouble spot is how to deal with renters who want
service but landlords who don't want to pay to have it installed.

But while there are questions still to be answered, the keys for
right now is that this model has worked elsewhere, and now at long
last we have someone willing to step out and see if it can work here
in the US.

So I say to UTOPIA: best of luck as you continue on these endeavors!
The rest of the country is watching, and we're all hoping you succeed
as there are millions of us that wish we could get our fiber now but
can't.

And to Brigham City: Kudos to you all! We are all cheering you on,
inspired by your commitment to getting yourselves wired with the most
important infrastructure of the 21st century.




Update on the Ottawa pilot

http://www.techmediareports.ca/reports/content/ottawa_fibre_to_the_home_expe
riment_hits_a_snag

Lessons from the land of cheap broadband in Hong Kong

[Excerpts from CNN article. While HK density is a factor, it still does not account for the huge price differential in Internet pricing between HK and elsewehere in the world. I love the quote "The telecom industry tends to commoditize people. Our strategy is to commoditize bandwidth". - BSA]

Lessons from the land of cheap broadband in Hong Kong

http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/11/13/lessons-from-the-land-of-cheap-broadband/?source=yahoo_quote



City Telecom's 400,000 customers pay $13 a month for 100 megabit synchronous broadband. And they get a money-back guarantee: If they don't clock 80% of the promised speed, the company pays them twice their monthly fee.



If you live within coverage area of Verizon's FiOS
service (VZ
), you pay as much as $150 a month for up to 50 megs downstream and 20 upstream.

How can City Telecom possibly offer service that's more than twice as fast at less than 10% of the price?

Density is a blessing

It's partly geography and partly vision. While Hong Kong has 7 million inhabitants, only a small fraction of the island's mountainous terrain is developed, which means everyone basically lives on top of each other. The population density is 16,380 people per square mile – versus 640 in Japan and 80 in the US. That makes every customer far cheaper to serve. "We have a phenomenal network built at $200 per home. Verizon is talking about a cost of north of $1,000 per home,"
Lai says. "We built ours at one-fifth the cost."

Of course building the network in the first place required vision.
City Telecom was founded 17 years ago as an international calling-card company by two cousins who plowed in 100,000 Canadian dollars to get started. They could have leased lines to get into Internet-service business the way many carriers do, but that would have meant encountering the same last-mile bottleneck. So, they built their own $400 million network over a decade.

And now the company is on a tear. The largest IP service provider on Hong Kong, PCCW , has about 1 million customers, according to Lai, but is growing at a fraction of the pace. It added only 3,000 in the last six months, compared to 41,000 for City Telecom. PCCW recently slashed its prices to match City Telecom, but still can't come near the speeds. But can City Telecom really make a business out of cheap broadband?

Innovation trumps incumbency

Lai insists the company already has. "The network is cash flow positive since 07. We're debt free with 10% revenue growth and 30% EBITDA growth," he says. "Our stock is up 200% in 12 months, and the market is starting to realize what we're doing."

All that success, Lia adds, is a result of having a Big Hairy Audacious Goal and doing everything possible to achieve it. "The telecom industry tends to commoditize people. Our strategy is to commoditize bandwidth, to make 100 megabits the industry norm in Hong Kong," he says. "Our plan is to win by offering the best service at the lowest possible cost structure. Thirteen dollars is not a lot, but if you scale it and drive your cost base down, it's a beautiful business to be in."

If only some US telecom executives felt likewise.